It would be interesting to see a meta-study reviewing previous studies of substances that have been found to increase cancer risk, to find out what length of time it takes to see a plausible link. Is 6 years typically long enough to see much effect? I speculate it depends on the type of cancer; some grow much faster than others.
(this was meant in reply to the original article btw, not in response to Mig's discussion on inflammation itself as cancer risk which is something I've also heard)
Last edited by SJLC; 03/19/10 07:26 PM. Reason: Note on intended target of reply
