sue, aloha
i didn't mean to sell ya short.
sorry, i've been here so long now...sometimes it all sorta blurrs because sometimes three/four people are simultaneously
gnawing at the same bone and i just have an aversion discussing something possi is discussing in a reply to whoever...
it's a conversation right out there for you and you can join in at anytime.
and i am handicapped by reading every post and having an 'associative memory'...once i read something i discover to be correct i simply absorb, grok and add it to my paintbox of words.
there have been several generational advancements in diagnostic criteria over the past 50/60 years...this is an ancient
called by many names over time disease.
you might look for a couple new New York criteria, a Toronto proposal, and rewrites in medical texts...
you might search under Inanna's history as she has linked some of this stuff in the past.
best
aB
