Hi John
I only used your figure of 98% because I was too lazy to look up your other quotation which I thought was from the same 2% balance. Here it is -
"It was not my intention to give the impression that there are no vegetarian tigers, only that Ebringer did not find any. I happen to know that there ARE diet insensitive sufferers ....Extrapolating the 9-month ESR values for Ebringer's primary test cases, some of them would not have achieved a normal value until 2-1/2 years!"
Were those ones cheating too?
By the way the mis-diagnosed ones would not be vegetarian tigers. Zebras with indigestion perhaps?
Wally
